Evaluation in Action: Simplifying Complexity for Charter Networks

For charter networks, evaluation is rarely simple. Leaders are often responsible for managing hundreds of rubrics, multiple staff roles, and varied state or authorizer requirements, all while trying to keep the focus on instructional quality and educator growth.

As networks scale, complexity compounds. What begins as flexibility can turn into administrative burden, pulling leaders away from coaching conversations and into manual processes.

That challenge was the focus of Evaluation in Action: Simplifying Complexity for Charter Networks at Education Advanced’s Charter Leadership Exchange, where Education Advanced leaders walked through how charter organizations can operationalize evaluation at scale. The discussion provided a practical look at how systems, not spreadsheets, will support consistency, visibility, and growth.

The session was led by product experts Dr. Heidi King, Amy Stock, Dr. Kim Tunnell, and Lisa Tunnell, who shared real-world examples of how Evaluation is used in large, multi-campus charter environments.

Key Takeaways from the Session

• Evaluation systems must adapt to charter complexity, not force networks into one-size-fits-all models.
• Customizable frameworks allow networks to manage multiple rubrics, roles, and requirements in one system.
• Automation reduces administrative friction and increases follow-through.
• Network-level reporting gives leaders visibility into trends across schools and staff types.
• When evaluation is streamlined, leaders can spend more time supporting teaching and learning.

How can networks manage multiple rubrics and staff roles without creating chaos?

Charter networks often support teachers, instructional coaches, administrators, and non-instructional staff, each with different evaluation needs. Evaluation allows networks to house all rubrics and forms in a single system while tailoring workflows by role.

Leaders can standardize expectations where it matters, while still honoring state- or role-specific requirements.

Insight: Flexibility at scale requires systems that centralize complexity instead of distributing it across disconnected tools.

How does automation reduce administrative burden for leaders?

Automated workflows handle task assignments, timelines, and reminders, reducing the need for manual tracking and follow-up.

When processes are automated, leaders can focus on feedback and coaching rather than chasing paperwork.

Insight: Automation isn’t about removing human judgment—it’s about removing unnecessary friction so leaders can lead.

What kind of visibility do charter leaders gain through reporting and dashboards?

Network-level reporting allow leaders to see completion rates, rubric trends, and growth areas across schools and roles.

This visibility supports proactive decision-making, helping leaders identify where support is needed before issues escalate.

Insight: Visibility transforms evaluation from a compliance task into a strategic leadership tool.

Turning Systems Into Support

This session demonstrated how evaluation systems can either amplify complexity or simplify it. For charter networks, the difference lies in whether systems are built to reflect real operational needs.

Evaluation is designed specifically for this reality.  

With customizable frameworks, automated workflows, and network-level reporting, Evaluation helps charter organizations manage complexity without losing sight of what matters most: people, instruction, and growth.

Ready to see Evaluation in action for your charter network?

Book a personalized demo today and explore how leading charter organizations are simplifying evaluation at scale.